• Home
  • About First Venture Legal
  • Areas of Practice
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

First Venture Legal

Get a free consult

Make Sure Your NDA Keeps Your Protections under Trade Secret Laws

July 19, 2013 by James Johnson Leave a Comment

Tweet

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in a case involving a non-disclosure agreement in license negotiations. The NDA was intended to protect the trade secrets of each party. However, the NDA also required that such trade secrets either be designated as confidential by the NDA, or be later designated as such in a written memorandum. However, the plaintiff in the Federal Circuit case failed to designate the trade secrets it disclosed in subsequent meetings of the parties as confidential. Among their legal theories, the plaintiffs argued that California (where the parties were located) trade secret law nevertheless protected the disclosed trade secrets even though they were not marked confidential by a written memorandum, and therefore the defendant’s use of the trade secrets constituted tortious misappropriation of trade secrets. The Federal Circuit ruled that the written agreement of the NDA supplanted any implied understanding granted by the statutory and case trade law. Furthermore, the court noted that the California Uniform Trade Secret Act held that misappropriation could only occur under circumstances that gave rise to a duty to maintain secrecy. When entering into NDAs, it is important to note the requirements of the agreement — some can require the parties to designate that material which they consider to be confidential or a trade secret. Under this ruling, which coming from the Federal Circuit could have broad impact, parties to a NDA may have greater responsibilities or burdens than what is required under the common or statutory trade secret law. And above all, it is important to stress the confidentiality of trade secrets when disclosing to other parties in negotiations or similar circumstances, as a public disclosure — which disclosure without proper notice of confidentiality could result in — can serve to eliminate the protection of trade secret law.

Intellectual Property, Legal News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(617) 600-6132

Site Disclaimer

None of the information presented on this site is intended or inferred to be or to be used as legal advice or as a substitute for legal advice, or is intended or inferred to create an attorney-client relationship. If you require legal advice or the services of an attorney, please contact First Venture Legal or another attorney for that specific purpose.

First Venture Legal and its attorneys claim no special training or expertise in any particular area of law. By accessing this site or its contents, either directly or through a third party, you acknowledge that you understand and accept the terms of this disclaimer. Thank you.

Copyright © 2023 · First Venture Legal · PO Box 410121 Cambridge , MA 02141 · Powered by ThriveHive