• Home
  • About First Venture Legal
  • Areas of Practice
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

First Venture Legal

Get a free consult

Non-Compete Agreements and the Anti-Planning Provision

July 30, 2013 by James Johnson Leave a Comment

Tweet

Non-compete agreements, as the name suggests, prohibit a party from competing in the same line of business as the other party in the agreement for a certain period specified in the agreement. When an employee is the bound party the agreement also involves taking employment in a competitor, but traditionally the focus is on barring a party from owning or operating a competing business venture. State laws usually permit the bound party to prepare to compete upon the expiration of the agreement. Such preparation can include drafting business and marketing plans, launching websites, incorporation, and even (under certain circumstances) contacting prospective clients and customers — essentially, the bound party has to stop short of actually engaging in commerce in competition with the other party. However, some non-compete agreements also include an anti-planning provision, which in addition to prohibiting competition also bars a party from taking the above planning actions. A Texas court recently upheld the findings of an arbitration panel that an anti-planning provision of a non-compete agreement was valid under the Delaware law that the agreement had chosen. The court found that the parties were free to contract for the anti-planning provision (or any provision) as long as it did not violate state law. Consequently, the result would likely be the same in most, if not all states — I cannot think of a state that prohibits anti-planning provisions (though if there is a state I would welcome an email letting me know about it!). If you are under or asked to sign a non-compete agreement and you may want to start a competing venture, make sure that your agreement does not have an anti-planning provision; if it does, be sure not to violate the provision. In the above case, the arbitration panel equitably extended the agreement for an additional year; at the very least, you could be subject to damages for breach. Read more: http://www.smoothtransitionslawblog.com/2013/07/articles/noncompete-agreements/antiplanning-provisions-a-new-noncompete-weapon/

General Legal Issues

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(617) 600-6132

Site Disclaimer

None of the information presented on this site is intended or inferred to be or to be used as legal advice or as a substitute for legal advice, or is intended or inferred to create an attorney-client relationship. If you require legal advice or the services of an attorney, please contact First Venture Legal or another attorney for that specific purpose.

First Venture Legal and its attorneys claim no special training or expertise in any particular area of law. By accessing this site or its contents, either directly or through a third party, you acknowledge that you understand and accept the terms of this disclaimer. Thank you.

Copyright © 2023 · First Venture Legal · PO Box 410121 Cambridge , MA 02141 · Powered by ThriveHive